‘It’s heartbreaking’: the way thirty captive beluga whales are being used as bargaining chips in dispute over animal welfare.
Jelly Bean’s offspring Bertie Botts is an cute small “sweetheart”. Orion – called “Onion” – is a big but very loyal friend. Another whale, Zephyr has “ants in his pants” and moves like a worm. Lillooet the beluga is the “biggest cuddle bug” with a kind nature.
Thirty enclosed beluga whales in a Canada-based entertainment facility have been caught in a struggle between a defunct facility, local and national governments and welfare campaigners.
But those most familiar with the whales say the intense discussion over their future often fails to consider the complexities of the whales who, after growing up in captivity, have been thoroughly researched by the people who work with them regularly.
After the Canadian government prevented the sale of the belugas to a foreign facility, the struggling facility near Niagara Falls where they are housed threatened to put them down unless the government funds the expense of keeping them alive. The nation’s marine resources official has denied that request, placing the thirty whales in an increasingly precarious situation.
Highly Cognitive Sea Creatures
Experts say that belugas’ brain structure, along with their vocal imitation skills, cognitive challenges and social skills suggest they are highly cognitive mammals – something a former trainer observed directly.
Burgess spent a significant period as a whale caretaker, a position that entailed earning the trust of the aquatic animals.
“Building up those connections over time takes a lot of regularity and a lot of love. At the start, they’re very unsure of you,” she said. “Eventually, you gain shared confidence. And they start being more trusting with you. It’s just so magical and gratifying.”
Burgess knew the whales were exceptionally cognitive, but she says she was even so amazed by the details and idiosyncrasies in their dispositions. She formed a deep bond for Eve and Cleopatra with contrasting personalities.
“One whale accepted me. The other made me earn it,” she said. “Each altered the way I understand bonding.”
Growing Opposition and Facility Decline
Burgess’s interaction with the whales progressed against a background of rising activist criticism to their captivity.
During her tenure at the attraction, seven belugas and the park’s one orca, Kiska, succumbed. In all, nineteen belugas have perished at the park since 2019, a number which the facility links to age-related causes, but which campaigners say reflects the substandard environment in which they were maintained.
The facility did not operate to the public over the summer, but Burgess says she saw with her own eyes results of the cessation. “Structural materials is falling apart from the pools because they’re falling apart and not being repaired. The whales are inquisitive and so they pick it up and move about with chunks in their mouth. It’s heartbreaking to see.”
The facility did not comment to a inquiry, but previously asserted: “The whales … obtain far superior medical attention and constant attention than any human in the United Kingdom, or other places.”
Fate in Limbo and Potential Resolutions
The former employee was fired from the facility in the spring following the demise of Eos, an unwell beluga the caretakers had to euthanize. She said the park suspected details of the incident were leaked to the media and she was let go shortly thereafter.
The ambiguity over the whales’ future has left her and staff members in distress. She says the park’s threat to kill its whales is a bargaining chip and is a “logistically impossible” undertaking, adding any plans to euthanize even a one beluga would require “significant personnel”, equipment and specialized tools.
“It’s impossible in hell the caretakers would ever do it,” she said.
She supports demands for the whales to be removed right away from the facility, with its crumbling tanks and reduced personnel.
In recent months, Canada’s government official rejected a proposal to export the whales to China.
“To approve the proposal would have meant a perpetual situation in confinement and a reversion to display for amusement,” the minister commented. “As the public, we know that belugas should be in the ocean, not in enclosures for our enjoyment. I could not in good conscience authorize an export that would continue the situation these belugas have suffered.”
But the former trainer said the official’s statements reveal a more general incorrect perception of the facts of life for belugas living their whole lives in enclosures.
“The people needs to realize these are whales that have spent their whole lives in confinement and they will need human care for the rest of their years,” she said. “Many just don’t comprehend that it’s not as easy as saying ‘end operations’.”
Sanctuary Proposal and Ongoing Debate
As officials struggle to find a resolution, suggestions have surfaced, some of which have little basis in reality. One proposal called for the belugas to be released into the wilds of northern regions – where whales are a primary resource of food for Indigenous peoples.
A planned refuge in the province of eastern Canada, which recently received regulatory clearance, has been contentious. The future site, which includes 100 acres of penned in ocean, is not yet built. Supporters remain optimistic that it could in time represent a permanent answer for some of the whales.
But, the former trainer says, among caretakers she’s discussed with, there is “no trust there” about what she said is “only an untested concept” in the whales’ future.
Others say the possibility of a sanctuary indicates a worldwide trend away from zoos and aquariums and could represent a viable plan in the short term.
An official, head of the initiative, said the site will mimic the intellectual stimulation and nutrition the whales receive from specialists, albeit in a much larger environment. He said after the well-being of whales is completely examined, which could take months|an extended period|